Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Branch: The Real C.C (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete a7, no assertion of notability. NawlinWiki 03:01, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

West Branch: The Real C.C
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Future NN student produced television show, fails WP:RS Rackabello 00:57, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm going to explain the rationale for deletion, even though it's so obvious as to be almost unnecessary. Okay, (1) There are no citations, (2) Much of the "overview" section is POV, and biased in favor of the production, by comparing it's positive traits against other programs' negative traits, (3) The production is in pre-production, and WP:FILM states that a film must actually be in production to have a wikipedia article, and (4) There is absolutely no assertion of notability. I hope that's a decent enough explanation. Calgary 01:09, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:N and WP:CRYSTAL. There's no show yet and the article is being (mis)used for promotional purposes by the nonexistent show's creator.  Or Speedy Delete due to the lack of any assertion of notability. --  But | seriously | folks   01:52, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Good grief, how did this not get speedied in the first place? Totally non-notable, unsourced, would even fly in a middle school class. Realkyhick 02:24, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Agree with Realkyhick. No WP:RS. jddphd (talk · contribs) 02:29, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Kids playing around with camcorder? Bad article idea.  Kids planning on maybe playing around with camcorder someday?  REALLY bad article idea. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  02:57, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.