Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Huaxia Road (Shanghai Metro)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 16:35, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

West Huaxia Road (Shanghai Metro)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable IMO. Hello71 (talk) 23:05, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep I believe metro stations have inherent notability. Taroaldo (talk) 23:23, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Metro stations are notable per WP:N and WP:GNG. There is a large precedent on this, as many other such articles exist. &mdash;  P C  B  23:26, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:OUTCOMES.--Arxiloxos (talk) 23:43, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - Rail stations are generally kept as notable and it would a severe waste of time to flesh out and argue the notability of each and every one in the world. Editors time is better spent improving and creating articles. --Oakshade (talk) 05:09, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - Many rail station articles here can be thin on the ground with facts.--Whiteguru (talk) 09:53, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:04, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:04, 9 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - just as notable as the other stations on this line. Racepacket (talk) 21:57, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. All other rail stations are considered to be notable - I fail to see why this one should be an exception. -- Necrothesp (talk) 22:39, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep jorgenev (talk) 22:45, 9 April 2011
 * Keep, likely WP:SNOW. I am perplexed as to why the nominator chose this particular station and not any of the other 200+ members of Category:Railway stations in Shanghai. "Not notable IMO" is not a policy or guideline-based rationale to recommend deletion; indeed, per WP:OUTCOMES, metro stations have inherent and consensus notability. -- Kinu t /c  23:12, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I wonder if the notability of the station is also in question for the hundreds of thousands that pass through the station daily? Jtbobwaysf (talk) 13:28, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - Metro stations have inherent notability. -- Joaquin008  ( talk ) 17:22, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.