Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Hudson, New Jersey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  07:14, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

West Hudson, New Jersey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Similar to Articles for deletion/North Hudson, New Jersey, I have never heard of anyone using this term nor can it be found in reliable sources. WP:GEOLAND requires "non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources." Rusf10 (talk) 03:23, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 03:23, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 03:23, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Added:
 * Delete Utterly absurd: none of the sources provided even use the phrase "West Hudson". Lack of definitive google results seems to fall under WP:A11. Reywas92Talk 08:07, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Djflem (talk) 11:58, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Just like North Hudson, New Jersey, this is a quadrant of Hudson County. Various institutions of the region are named for it, such as West Hudson A.A., so it is a reasonable broad topic.  Deletion is quite inappropriate per our policies WP:ATD, WP:NOTPAPER, WP:PRESERVE, &c. Andrew D. (talk) 11:06, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Typical "nothing can be deleted" argument. All the policies mentioned are meaningless when the topic does not even pass WP:V. The existence of an obscure soccer team from the early 20th century is completely irrelevant here. Find a source that actually refers to the towns themselves as "West Hudson"--Rusf10 (talk) 15:50, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Keep historical and current colloquial name for the western part of Hudson County.Djflem (talk) 22:26, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge into Hudson County. It barely passes Notability IMO (and barely notable is still notable), with the archived source here stating that New Jersey boasts its own self-contained soccer culture in West Hudson, the western section of Hudson County between Newark International Airport and the Meadowlands, an urban island bounded by the Passaic River and New Jersey Turnpike. (emphasis mine) and the archived Portal Bridge source here stating that The area now occupied by the ‘West Hudson’ towns of Kearny and Harrison. Having said that, I think the article as it currently is is full of padding and would be better off in the main Hudson County article. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 20:22, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * It most certainly is not a colloquial name. Having lived in New Jersey, I have never even once heard anyone use this name. And if it is historical as you claim, then you should have no problem providing sources. (and not those that just refer to some obscure soccer team)--Rusf10 (talk) 22:34, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Having lived in New Jersey, I have never even once heard anyone use this name. Rusf10 having heard is not a criterium, you know? But now you have.

Added to artcle:

Djflem (talk) 12:04, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete As with the North Hudson article, this article's badly WP:SYNTH. The region on its own doesn't pass WP:GNG as the only clear definition comes from an article on the history of soccer. It's also not legally defined per WP:GEO. SportingFlyer  T · C  05:00, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
 * That claim disregards this historial map, making it untrue.
 * What does the link WikiProject Geographical coordinates have to do with 'legally defined'?, which is not expressed anywhere? have posed question at here too.Djflem (talk) 08:04, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Meant WP:GEOLAND, sorry. That map doesn't define the term "West Hudson." SportingFlyer  T · C  02:38, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Additional contemporary uses not used in article:
 * Clara Maass Medical Center West Hudson Division
 * West Hudson byline

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep per Articles for deletion/North Hudson, New Jersey. ST47 (talk) 23:31, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 16:32, 25 June 2019 (UTC) WP:HEY Referencese which need to be addressed:


 * Comment As with Articles for deletion/West Essex, (a distinct part of Essex County, New Jersey) which the Wikipedia community has overwhelmingly decided is a place, both West Hudson and North Hudson are recognizable distinct regions. To keep one and not others is inconsistent and diminishes Wikipedia's validity as a encyclopedia.
 * Djflem (talk) 08:45, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Djflem (talk) 00:25, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep The term West Hudson has significance--mainly demographic today, but resulting from specific historic events and geography not mentioned in the article. Give me a week or so and I can edit to explain/cite and otherwise improve. Cjschopfer (talk) 15:15, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 06:40, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep While it's disappointing to see some sources added here that do not support what they purport to (The Medium article "The Rise and Fall of American Soccer" says ...working class communities in the industrial West Hudson region of New York, New Jersey and Philadelphia... Huh?) along with others that only refer to the established towns in the region, not West Hudson, there is still just enough coverage of this name, especially in some of the technical sources, to prove that this is a place. The article should be moved to West Hudson. StonyBrook (talk) 10:35, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY. This is a well-sourced article about a definable place. "Importance" is not the same as notability, which this passes. Bearian (talk) 16:50, 8 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.