Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Midlands Bus Route 302


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Fram (talk) 14:23, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

West Midlands Bus Route 302

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete non-notable.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 18:48, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Nomination withdrawn. Created in error.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 18:52, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Delete (renominating) non-notable.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 06:07, 18 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Note I tagged this for G7 since the author created the nom in error. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:07, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I have removed the speedy tag because it was placing all related deletion pages in the speedy category. I have no opinion on the article being discussed. JPG-GR (talk) 19:54, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I was about to do the same, given Mandsford's "delete" below. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:55, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Delete - I think that is what we have done with bus routes elsewhere. These days they seem to be subject to frequent change. I took a differnet view on the low number London bus routes, which often have a long history of stability. Peterkingiron (talk) 00:32, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete anyway Nominated in error? No, I think you were right the first time.  Maybe you can merge all the West Midlands Bus Routes into one article, and when I have to go from Bloxwich to Walsall, and then back to Bloxwich, I can consult that.  Mandsford (talk) 19:25, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge & Redir - Unless there is something that provides notability to this perticular bus route. Merge into West Midlands. Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  07:26, 18 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.