Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West suffolk racing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 07:25, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

West suffolk racing

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Minor racing team that is not inherently notable, and with no available sources it fails GNG. QueenCake (talk) 22:20, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:37, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:37, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:37, 21 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Google searched - nothing. No refs. Szzuk (talk) 17:56, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:24, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔   03:43, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:57, 12 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Tired of seeing this one on the watch list now, anyone? Szzuk (talk) 21:53, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't think I've ever seen such a clean cut case linger for so long at AFD. Beyond the lack of refs and notability, it's clearly been written by a drive-by account from someone at the team. If only I could of speedied it. QueenCake (talk) 22:56, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - I have to ask why was it relisted 3 times? ... This is by a mile CSD material, Anyway Clearly written to promote, Fails GNG. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  23:27, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.