Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westchester PC Users Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. bainer (talk) 01:03, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Westchester_PC_Users_Group
Completely idiosyncratic non-topic. Also, even though it's a non-profit group, it seems like advertising to me. This should be on Google, not Wikipedia. Belmore 00:20, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - it's just a local computer club. They can create their own website to hold this kind of information. Howie  &#9742;  03:09, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * ? - Yes, it's just a local computer club, similar to other local computer clubs listed in Wikipedia. The group did create their own website, and has maintained it for a number of years(see the external link.)  It is also searchable in Google, as suggested.   If it was decided that local computer clubs with over 500 members should not be listed in Wikipedia, then they should be removed.
 * Previous unsigned comment by User:Fat and Bald. JoaoRicardo 06:01, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak delete, doesn't seem particularly notable. &mdash; J I P  | Talk 09:01, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak delete as per nomination. 600 members is a lot, but there's just nothing encyclopedia here.   Snurks  T  C 09:18, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I don't buy the "cruft justifies more cruft" article.  Wikicities seems to be the right home for this kind of thing, no? Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 11:59, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Advertising tone, not encyclopedic, possible vanity.-- Dak ota     t     e   16:45, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's nothing in the article that makes it seem notable enough for keeping. peachlette 21:23, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Six hundred members is a lot for a local organization, but it is not enough to get into Wikipedia. JoaoRicardo 06:01, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment, for precedent see Articles for deletion/WPCUG --maclean25 07:37, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak delete minor group. Precedent was no consensus. Stifle 14:19, 12 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.