Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Western Arctic Green Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. MastCell Talk 22:49, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Western Arctic Green Party

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

First of all, this is not even a political party, its a subdivision of the Green Party of Canada known as an electoral district association each major party in Canada has 308 of these, second this article is so badly written and reads like nonsense. I have tried to find sources on this but have come with nothing, the one link listed in the External links really has nothing to do with claims made by the article. I have found no evidence of the Green Party running a slate of candidates in the Northwest Territories territorial elections as it is categorized. The meat of the article is 12 Green Party of Canada members who ran 1 candidate that got 300 votes Cloveious 03:23, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 06:48, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * Delete Fails WP:CORP. --RucasHost 04:38, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
 * agreed, quick scan shows this is nonsensical.JJJ999 06:11, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge Green Parties are decentralized. There is very little by way of top down organizational structure, so the Green Party of Canada is really less notable than any regional party.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.17.124.2 (talk) 03:44, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete after lookig at Category:Green political parties in Canada, they dont name any articles by "federal electoral district" name (although a move and rewrite is possible for an expert in the subject) Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  21:24, 23 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.