Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Western Civilization2

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was remove content and redirect to Western world. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:58, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Western civilzation
Procedural nomination. This article had been listed for VfD earlier, when I speedied it as nonsense. The deletion was disputed. I have agreed to undelete and allow it a chance on VfD. SWAdair | Talk 02:56, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The correctly spelled versions of this title redirect to Western world.  This article is nonsense.  SWAdair | Talk  05:22, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, patent nonsense and/or original research. (Yes, something can be both!) --Angr/comhrá 06:05, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or misspelling redirect. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 06:08, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, original research. Megan1967 06:55, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. No reason not to speedy. Eixo 07:59, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, agree with the earlier decision to speedy as nonsense.-gadfium 08:48, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, OR, should be speedy. Borb 10:17, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and fully support speedy as nonsense and vandalism... it was created by a user who added many nonsense articles last week under several different usernames. I'm pretty sure I speedied another version  of this article then, too. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  11:34, May 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * I'll second that speedy - patent nonsense by vandal--Doc (t) 12:25, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Rewrite Article itself is all over the place, but the phrase "Western Civilization" is well used, often to describe the alternative to "3rd world countries". It should be written in that context.  Is it worth editing it to make it worth looking at? Internodeuser 13:08, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * fine but look again at the title --Doc (t) 13:19, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Say what? I looked at the article and it looks like utter patent nonsense. Speedy delete. Hermione1980 18:44, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; apparently a big load of dingo's kidneys &mdash; RJH 19:03, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Speedy Delete was the proper action. Recreate as a redirect to Western world. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 19:34, May 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete under general criterion #1: patent nonsense. --Carnildo 19:46, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, no redirect at this misspelling. --TenOfAllTrades (talk/contrib) 20:38, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Rewrite or Redirect to Western World. Falphin 22:01, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Pavel Vozenilek 00:46, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Patent nonsense. Delete, candidate for speedy deletion. Possibly recreate as a redirect to Western world. - Mike Rosoft 11:26, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. It sounds like something Douglas Adams would write. 69.205.224.242 12:25, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.