Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Western Suburbs Rosellas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. Agent 86 00:23, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Western Suburbs Rosellas

 * — (View AfD)

Contested PROD. 'Sources needed' tag was removed at the same time. No evidence of notability. Google results are less than convincing. The JPS talk to me  11:29, 7 December 2006 (UTC) It now resembles a useful article about a notable team. My delete is withdrawn, as is the AFD. The JPS talk to me  10:44, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Very little information of use to anybody who is not the team, or direct followers. And, I dont even know if they would find this useful.  Let it go, let it go, let ig go. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 12:41, 7 December 2006 (UTC) - Keep - lot of content added and article cleaned up.  -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 10:37, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Firelement85 14:38, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete Could be notable and a worthy article. This falls into the gray area the AFDs cannot handle: Could be useful, notable, good article, but without more information it's hard to determine that. If the article is expanded to include basics (where, what league, players, etc), then it could be determined worthy of keeping, but until then, not. -- MECU ≈ talk 16:02, 7 December 2006 (UTC) Keep has had hall of fame members and been around for almost a century. -- MECU ≈ talk 13:27, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - unlike the other Newcastle rugby league team recently up for deletion, which was kept because of notable former players and good referencing, this one does not have that and is lacking in information to make it notable. If some references are provided to show that it is a notable team, I'll change my vote. Keep - now with notable players and an established relationship to the Newcastle Knights referenced, it is notable and worth keeping. JROBBO 09:49, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Any club that produces 19 internationals as claimed would certainly be notable. Any club that Johnny Raper played for is certainly notable. Any club that Matthew Gidley played for as a junior is certainly notable. The Newcastle competition was the third strongest in Australia after Sydney and Brisbane and clubs who have played in it for the better part of 100 years is notable. Capitalistroadster 02:48, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.