Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Western World (ship)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep--Ymblanter (talk) 07:30, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Western World (ship)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability is not explained. A cursory glance at the google results does not show anything to indicate notability. WP:MEMORIAL. King Jakob  C2 00:07, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 2 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. A search on Google Books and Google News shows sufficent information to establish notability. Proper following of WP:BEFORE requires more than a "cursory glance" at WP:GHITS; nominating the article within an hour of its creation is somewhat WP:BITEy as well. (Also citing WP:MEMORIAL is somewhat odd seeing as nobody was lost in the wreck.) - The Bushranger One ping only 00:55, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Um? I just searched on Google Books and Google News and couldn't find one relevant book/news source. King Jakob  C2 01:35, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * You need to use more specific search terms. "Western World"+ship+"New Jersey"+1853 finds sources. - The Bushranger One ping only 01:56, 2 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Seems notable enough. Johnbod (talk) 17:27, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.