Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westfield Tea Tree Plaza


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Withdrawn. - Longhair\talk 08:38, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Westfield Tea Tree Plaza
Does not attempt to assert any form of notability. At best it could be merged into the city article, but the local existed for all of 22 minutes. Vegaswikian 19:19, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge/Delete and Discipline Tuddy - The article is NN per here as mentioned. At best it can be merged.  I propose the ban based on the user's childish edits (scroll down a bit/NSFW) and refusal to learn Wikipedia's policies.  Please note by the user's contribs that they have a thing for articles about shopping centers/retail stores and that these articles are usually merged or deleted.  Numerous attempts have been made to alert the user to their disruptiveness, but so far nothing has changed.  - b o b b y  19:46, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment The link to the Adelaide CBD by the very unique O-Bahn sets this shopping centre apart from others. Raffles mk 23:14, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 *  Delete  I got shot down once when I said that google hits for local news coverage sufficed for local notability. No google news hits here. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim   23:39, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Change to keep Thanks, Rebecca. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim
 *  Delete . Yet another of the multiple non-notable articles created by .  Unless verifiable references can be provided which confirm notability per WP:CORP, get rid of it. --Elonka 23:42, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Now that the article has been expanded, I agree it's worth keeping.  I would also point out that this same effect could have been obtained by just expanding it after the local tag was added to it, rather than going into a revert war and eventual AfD.  I recommend that in the future, when articles are flagged with the "local" tag, that it be treated as a normal expansion request, rather than as some kind of censure. Then if the article is not or cannot be expanded within a reasonable amount of time, its information can be merged into a more appropriate location, such as the chain's article, and/or the article about the local community where the establishment is located. --Elonka 18:40, 1 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep. Has 84 newspaper edits on Factiva. Second-largest shopping centre in South Australia. Specifically linked to the CBD by the O-Bahn. Of interest to people, like myself, who have never been remotely near there. This militant deletionism of perfectly notable and interesting articles is getting really tiresome. Rebecca 03:41, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Rebecca. The O-Bahn link is of significance. Capitalistroadster 04:09, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Capitalistroadster 04:09, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Rebecca. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 06:10, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as a major South Australian shopping centre and transport hub. I've expanded the article and referenced with some notable facts: for example, the centre was the location of a jewel heist last year. --Canley 08:15, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Capitalistroadster and Rebecca. The O-Bahn link gives it notability. Someone should put some info in about the transport interchange if there isn't something else already. JROBBO 12:51, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * There is an article about the interchange at Tea Tree Plaza Interchange. --Canley 08:47, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * There is an article about the interchange at Tea Tree Plaza Interchange. --Canley 08:47, 2 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Withdawn. The article has been completly rewritten since the nomination.  So the early votes do not apply to what is there today. Vegaswikian 18:10, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.