Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westin Causarina Las Vegas Hotel, Casino & Spa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 02:04, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Westin Causarina Las Vegas Hotel, Casino & Spa
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not even an indication of notability. WP:Notability (buildings), as regarding what it says about individual hotels. Speedy was denied on the grounds that this article has been here long enough that controversy is likely, but I think it makes more sense the other way around: if it's been around this long and still no one has added anything indicating notability, that speaks for itself. —Largo Plazo (talk) 02:50, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notability is established given that when it was nominated, there was at least one news source used.  Yes, the article does need work.  But that work is adding references which should be addressed by a cleanup tag and not bring it here for deletion.  Also WP:Notability (buildings) does not apply since notability is as a casino and not a building.  Vegaswikian (talk) 03:16, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't believe that a single article in the local paper that reports every time a bulldozer moves in Las Vegas doesn't reach the level of "significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources" (WP:Notability (businesses)). —Largo Plazo (talk) 10:59, 25 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:50, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:51, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The included sources seem to satisfy GNG, and I expect there are plenty more. Jclemens (talk) 18:15, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * keep - notability now satisfied and appropriately Cited. Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  04:14, 26 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.