Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WestlawNext


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merged. Chaser (talk) 00:51, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

WestlawNext
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

As noted in the previous discussion under Merge on the talk page, this discusses a facet of Westlaw that is already fully discussed on the main Westlaw page. Hence, it is totally unnecessary, as well as violates any rule about main treatment being in one place. -Busjack (talk) 14:37, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect. The discussion page seems to support it, and you can do it without bringing the article to WP:AFD. Pburka (talk) 17:53, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 18 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Based on your comment, I did that.--Busjack (talk) 22:16, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.