Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westlife songlist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, or at least, no consensus to delete. However, there is a strong inclination here to merge these three subarticles into one list. I support that as well. To the talkpages! Keeper  |   76   |   Disclaimer  20:23, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Westlife songlist

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason.
 * Many bands have recorded a lot of songs, but i'm not sure there is a need for a list of them for any band. Creator removed tags without comment or alteration.  tomasz.  13:08, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 *  tomasz.  13:18, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 *  tomasz.  13:18, 4 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - This is a List, lists are encouraged with WP:LIST. does not apply as each article listed has to meet it's own notability criteria, which they all will because Westlife is very notable and meets WP:MUSIC. ChessCreator (talk) 14:59, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Notability isn't inherited, and not all lists are encouraged: what use does this list serve?  tomasz.  16:41, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Can you link to assertion that 'Notability isn't inherited'? In the mean while I'll try and hunt down some info on this as presently WP:List is void of notability. Purpose of list, all three as of WP:LIST. Information, Navigation and Development. ChessCreator (talk) 17:19, 4 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge seems most appropriate (?). None of these are particularly large yet, and look fairly well fleshed-out (complete). Merging to a single location would be best. Also, Westlife songlist needs an intro paragraph. -- Quiddity (talk) 19:51, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Perfectly reasonable supplementary material to the Westlife article which is too large to merge into that article.  I can see no compelling reason why we should slice away parts of our coverage of this notable topic.  However, a merge of the three songlist articles into a single songlist article with more annotation is worth considering.--Father Goose (talk) 22:09, 4 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.