Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westmark School (Encino)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:19, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Westmark School (Encino)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is pure advertising, horrendous use of meaningless buzzwords, for an insignificant private school. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:40, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Encino, California per long-standing precedent stated at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. – Davey 2010 Talk 04:58, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - Oops my bad I wasn't aware it was a high school which are actually kept per SCHOOLOUTCOMES. – Davey 2010 Talk 20:36, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  05:06, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  05:06, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  05:06, 25 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Actually, our regular practice is to keep articles about high schools, and redirect those about most elementary and middle schools. This school teaches students through 12th grade so is a high school, and has been operating for decades. Here is coverage of the school in a book.Cullen328  Let's discuss it  08:29, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep . We have to keep this in order to stay true to our precedent as documented ar WP:OUTCOMES. I've reduced the article to its basics by editing out all the promotioal puff. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:42, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as a secondary school per longstanding consensus and precedent. -- Necrothesp (talk) 22:18, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.