Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westophobia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite (talk) 21:28, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Westophobia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No reliable sources to establish notability of this Neologism/Snowclone. Ahecht ( TALK PAGE ) 22:16, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable neologism that incidentally fails WP:NPOV with regards to the issues said neologism refers to. --Richard Yin (talk) 14:21, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

PAGE''' ]] ) 14:47, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. As the article notes, it is a neologism. There is no evidence that it has been adopted beyond Professor Al Mansouri's work. Cnilep (talk) 00:33, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notabe neologism and original reasearch.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 19:39, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Have any of you guys done a Google search?  There are a few hits right off:, , , this book, a few mentions in this book, an article about an essay in a book, etc.  I'm not saying the current article is worth saving, but the topic seems notable.  If we keep it, we can stub it and add the sources.  I don't see any English-language sources that indicate who coined the phrase, but it seems to go back to at least the early 1990s based on the New York Times article.  Of course, it's a fairly easy word to coin, so I wouldn't be surprised if we find earlier uses.  I'm not terribly interested in investigating this further, however. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:03, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment I was aware of the Jerusalem Post article (and discussed it on the article's talk page), but it uses the term exclusively in quotes, indicating that it is wordplay or a snowclone, not an accepted term. Similarly, the Kashmir times introduces the term in quotes, indicating that this it is not a term that the reader is expected to know. The first two books are by non-notable authors, and the second one uses the term in quotes. The article about the third book reads like a press release, and the book itself seems pretty non-notable given its complete lack of reviews. --Ahecht ( [[User_talk:Ahecht|'''TALK


 * Delete as a non-notable neologism. Carrite (talk) 17:10, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.