Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westrobothnian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The tech issues which resulted in the article being a plethora of red links seems to have been resolved for now. (non-admin closure) Hagennos  ❯❯❯  Talk  17:41, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Westrobothnian

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is a mess of language template errors on gmq-bot. Even though the article and the subject might be notable I am nominating this soft deletion or draftify to fix. Hagennos ❯❯❯  Talk  02:38, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose WP:SOFIXIT, WP:DEMOLISH, and who buggered up the templates? It didn't used to have all those errors. "Needs markup fixing" is not grounds for deletion. DuncanHill (talk) 03:03, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment I don't think this is an issue with the template. I tried WP:BEFORE to find the ISO lang codes from https://datahub.io/core/language-codes but could not find the gmq-bot the language code used. The errors were introduced in this edit by  (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Westrobothnian&oldid=809025859) and became worse after each edit by user Knyȝt  --  Hagennos  ❯❯❯  Talk  04:08, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 05:12, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 05:12, 14 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The reason all these errors are showing up is the recent rewriting of the lang template. There are two possible solutions: 1) set all instances of this template in the article to use a language tag that the template finds acceptable (gmq would do the trick if there isn't anything more specific), or 2) request support for the gmq-bot tag at Template talk:Lang. And, AfD isn't the place to seek help for fixing technical issues in articles; if you can't think of a more specific place, the WP:Teahouse is usually a good starting point. – Uanfala (talk) 05:35, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep I can't see any "mess" in the article. Perhaps the technical issues have been sorted out since it was nominated for deletion? /FredrikT (talk) 15:23, 17 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.