Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westside Park (Chehalis, Washington)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:26, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Westside Park (Chehalis, Washington)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A small-town local park with no significant coverage outside its immediate area, failing GNG and GEOLAND.  Sounder Bruce  07:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions.  Sounder  Bruce  07:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep GNG appears met, GEOLAND does not apply. Well sourced for what it is, no clear rationale for deletion has been articulated. That is, would Wikipedia be better off without this article? I see no reason at all why it would. Jclemens (talk) 08:01, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep there appear to be multiple sources discussing the park. GNG doesn't require coverage "outside the immediate area". No merge target identified by the nominator and it's unclear how merging this would benefit Wikipedia. Garuda3 (talk) 08:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Seriously? I thought articles on local restaurants/businesses/places required at least 1 mention from a source that's "outside the immediate area". Trying to run pages on purely local sources is what got a couple of my local business articles deleted. Americanfreedom (talk) 18:29, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
 * That's not surprising, businesses tend to be held to higher standards and there is the WP:NCORP guideline that is often used to get business articles deleted. There's no reason to hold articles on city parks to such high standards. Garuda3 (talk) 19:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
 * obvious redirect to Parks and recreation in Chehalis, Washington The coverage of a postage stamp of a city park by its small city newspaper is not going to get past any reasonable standard of notability. Mangoe (talk) 05:26, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I vote keep per GNG. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:57, 30 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.