Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wet 'N Reckless Brewing Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. slakr \ talk / 14:01, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Wet 'N Reckless Brewing Company

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

everything here is either very local, or from the firms own site  DGG ( talk ) 22:51, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:35, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:35, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:35, 2 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete No significant coverage from reliable sources. A brief mention in this reliable source confirms existence but not notability. BTW the article has been heavily edited by a Special Purpose Account with the same name as the brewery's founder/owner. --MelanieN (talk) 02:06, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - I consider the San Diego Reader to be a reliable source (article here). Northamerica1000(talk) 02:10, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I do too. I was trying to say that the reference provides coverage, but not significant coverage, from a Reliable Source. I will reword my comment to make it clearer. Sorry for any confusion. --MelanieN (talk) 03:19, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Did we read the same San Diego Reader article? Now the San Diego Magazine isn't significant coverage.  But the Reader?  Definitely is.  Currently leaning soft delete - a second solid source would be enough for a keep IMO. Neonchameleon (talk) 17:49, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry, my mistake; easy to do since both articles were by Brandon Hernandez, one of San Diego's two main writers about beer. (The other is Peter Rowe of the U-T.) You are right, chameleon; this provides one example of significant coverage, and a second could count as "multiple". --MelanieN (talk) 18:49, 3 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 08:14, 9 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.