Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wet Dog (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Malformed or not, the original discussion had 2 "keep" !votes. Therefore, I'm going to IAR and treat both discussions as one relisted discussion without any delete arguments aside from the original nom. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:26, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Wet Dog
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Procedural nomination. Article had an AfD nomination dated 8 September (Articles for deletion/Wet Dog) which I closed because it was a malformed nomination. Original AfD nomination rationale was as follows: "Nothing actually establishing their notability. has been tagged as such a substanital amount of time &mdash; TheBilly(Talk) 09:10, 8 September 2009 (UTC)" &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 19:38, 23 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 00:51, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 22:28, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Weak Keep, according to their website, they've been in Q magazine. There's also some coverage, but it's all in German.  They might also arguably meet criteria #6 of WP:MUSIC.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 07:02, 30 December 2009 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.