Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wet Paint Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 21:52, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Wet Paint Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:COMPANY. Unable to find even one reliable source to establish notability. Magnolia677 (talk) 03:04, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete as failing WP:CORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:40, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:35, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. Yet another WP:UPANDCOMING record label.  -- Finngall   talk  16:03, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.