Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wet blanket


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   changed to disambig page. (non-admin closure) Wiggles  oinks  waddles  19:24, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Wet blanket

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Only listed as AFD because it is older. Wikipedia is not a dictionary.  KJS 77  02:38, 12 March 2009 (UTC) -
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  -- &mdash; LinguistAtLarge • Talk  05:02, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I think a redirect to fire blanket would be appropriate per the first meaning of the word. - Mgm|(talk) 09:56, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - I don't think it's possible to create a useful article about this term. I don't believe that anyone looking for information about the term "wet blanket" would be satisfied with an article on "fire blanket". Deb (talk) 12:43, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have been bold and turned this into a disambiguation page, since I don't think a redirect to fire blanket is quite appropriate, and the current content violates WP:DICDEF, and I found several targets to link to in the dabpage. If you think this was innappropriate, please let me know and/or revert the edit.  Thanks! &mdash; LinguistAtLarge • Talk  16:44, 12 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.