Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wet floor effect


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Punkmorten 18:54, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Wet floor effect
Neologism. For a popular graphics effects technique there are far to few hits. --Pjacobi 17:08, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems to be the standard term, even though most of us (me included) wouldn't know what to call it, we would certainly know of its existance - I've certainly learnt something from that article. Dave 17:37, 15 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep. Notability seems established within the article. --Aaron 19:17, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Looks notable to me. YechielMan 23:25, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.