Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wetland ORM


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Wetland ORM

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is sourced only to the websites of the software's author. I'm searched, and I am not able to find any independent sources, so I believe the topic does not meet the general notability guideline, and this article should be deleted. The article author removed a PROD tag without adding sources, so here we are at AFD. MrOllie (talk) 23:36, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Can I just write my response here? Sorry, first time poster long time visitor :)

What would you say would be a good source then? Third party blogs? I'm curious as this is a serious project offering a new ORM to a language that doesn't have one on wikipedia yet. It's not a commercial product either. Sorry if I'm going about this all wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RWOverdijk (talk • contribs) 10:44, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * It can be hard to navigate all of the policy at first. In short, you need significant coverage in independent, reliable sources, with each of these terms having a fairly specific meaning on wikipedia. See WP:GNG linked above and WP:RS. Unfortunately, such coverage may not exist for many smaller software projects. WP:BLOGS are typically not used to establish notability, but there are occasional exceptions for recognized experts in a given field.Dialectric (talk) 16:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 10:51, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 00:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete This may be a subject that will generate independent coverage in the future. For now it doesn't satisfy notability guidelines. Like the nom my searches found nothing helpful. Happy to reconsider if better sources are found. Gab4gab (talk) 06:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.