Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weycrest (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete, will protect against recreation. Mango juice talk 16:14, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Weycrest
Previously deleted as spam at Articles for deletion/Weycrest, re-created by the original author,. No evidence of meeting WP:CORP, fair evidence of meeting WP:VSCA. Not technically a G4 as the content is somewhat different. Just zis Guy you know? 12:24, 22 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, spam. — Hex    (❝  ?!  ❞)   12:42, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

in what way is this spam?. It merely states what Weycrest does and where they are? There are no external "spam links" as such that I'm aware off. Explain how these other company contributions comply exactly? Cofinimmo, Namesco].], [[NDO (the latter of which is out of date and no longer exists as a seperate entity/company). Indeed NDO entry contains the following sales statement - "with the emphasis on customer service and not necessarily cheap and cheerful."  Sat Jul 22 13:58:48 BST 2006
 * The existence of other questionable articles has never been a compelling reaosn for keeping questionable articles. You are free to fix those articles or nominate them for deletion.  WP:CORP gives the measures used to establish notability for companies. Just zis Guy you know? 13:24, 22 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I wouldn't dream of deleting other articles, which have existed for some time despite being "questionable" in terms of the WP:CORP. Seems odd to me these have existed as long as they have. Sat Jul 22 17:51:17 BST 2006


 * Possibly because they are not on my watchlist as previously deleted articles. Just zis Guy you know? 10:29, 23 July 2006 (UTC)


 * You can delete whenever. We are setting up our own local wikipedia project for Docklands and will contribute articles to that. Oh and BTW stuff like this: Torchwood_Institute doesn't actually exist you know ;o) Tue Jul 25 10:07:43 BST 2006


 * Delete per nom, blatant vanity, comercial ect...--Musaabdulrashid 12:13, 27 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.