Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What's up gurgaon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. If you have an issue with the closing of this discussion, please take it to Deletion review. I am happy to userfy an article, just ask. Thanks for assuming good faith. SarahStierch (talk) 03:56, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

What's up gurgaon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * This page looks advertisory and may not be within WP:NN. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:56, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:09, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:09, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:09, 17 December 2013 (UTC)


 * User:Super Goku V left a message in my user talk page suspecting that "after User:Sugbali began the AfC review, User:Smridhiagg created the second article where it currently is with Sugbali making a single edit to that article as well. Considering the low number of edits that both users have made, is it bad faith to think they might be the same user?". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 07:50, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Simply put, both user edits only focus on this. In a bit more depth, as stated about, Sugbali made edits to review the article, yet helped edit the second article that Smridhiagg made in spite of the review.  After the merge, Smridhiagg has made 16 of their 18 edits to this article, with their remaining two edits for undeletion of what appears to be the same article.  Sugbali has made all three edits of their edits to this article, including their "review" of the article.  Delete per Not-Notable.  --Super Goku V (talk) 01:55, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: A 2013 start-up website, whose offered references are a mix of blogs and the same PR reprints. No evidence that this meets WP:NWEB. AllyD (talk) 09:28, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete As per AllyD  Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!}  (Whisper...) 11:36, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
 * keep — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swativ12 (talk • contribs) 12:10, 17 December 2013 (UTC)  — Swativ12 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * keep — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swativ12 (talk • contribs) 12:12, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Duplicate !vote struck. AllyD (talk) 12:31, 19 December 2013 (UTC)


 * keep — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhay 1236 (talk • contribs) 12:18, 17 December 2013 (UTC)  — Abhay 1236 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Delete - borderline promotional and notability is highly questionable. Deb (talk) 13:45, 17 December 2013 (UTC)


 * keep — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saurabh Punjabi (talk • contribs) 10:11, 19 December 2013 (UTC) — Saurabh Punjabi (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * keep the article is informative — Preceding unsigned comment added by User:Smridhiagg (talk — Smridhiagg (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * keep I found the article intresting — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sugbali (talk • contribs) 10:34, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * — Note to closing admin: Sugbali (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. Ivanvector (talk) 22:48, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment This opinion is hardly surprising, as Sugbali is the account which authored the article, though perhaps that has been lost in the blizzard of WP:SPA opinions. AllyD (talk) 12:24, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I added a tag for you. Ivanvector (talk) 22:48, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Delete: I searched Google News, and the one result was a press release from 2 December announcing the site's launch. The Wikipedia article was created one week later—too soon. &mdash; rybec   03:36, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per AllyD. Notable only locally, if at all. Ivanvector (talk) 22:48, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * keep This article is notable and legitimate as I have seen it in news forums and page. It has been offical media partner for various cultural festivals including MOMENTUM 2013. This event and it's sponsors were featured in gurgaon tmes and various other newspapers. Hence this article should be kept. 05:07, 20 December 2013‎ User:As9383 (sign unsigned; this was his first or only edit)
 * Delete - no evidence his passes our inclusion guidelines and the WP:MEAT vote-spam is just silly. It's advertising for a non-notable advertising portal. Delete this and be done with it. Stalwart 111  08:42, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Another article that was borderline G11 and the subject of significant puppetry and/or canvassing from users with a seeming COI. Mkdw talk 03:07, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.