Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What Culture Championship


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus  DGG ( talk ) 01:38, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

What Culture Championship

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An imaginary title created on a YouTube show treated as if it was actually a wrestling championship. "WhatCulture" does not have an article, nor does the WhatCulture Wrestling promotion (was AFD'ed) this should not exist. It fails notability big time, no sources, no coverage, nothing actually worthwhile.  MPJ  -DK 23:37, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Like noted by nominator, neither the main company nor the channel have an article due to lack of notability. This championship has even less notability, having no coverage whatsoever. Mr. Magoo (talk) 00:02, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

nah mang keep it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.247.231.80 (talk)

00:15, 19 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep The organisation should have an article as WhatCulture is a legitimate organisation. They run a highly successful website, as many as five YouTube channels (their wrestling channel is second only to WWE in subscribers) and own a successful wrestling company (WCPW). The belt is a significant part of the website, giving it notoriety, more so than many of the internet based rubbish on this site. User:AJW7X (talk) 12:09, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Neither of which are the subject of this article, so "something else is notable" is not a good argument.14:00, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

WhatCulture is currently the second most subscribed wrestling channel in YouTube behind World Wrestling Entertainment with ~850,000 subscribers, a legitimate wrestling promotion under their wing and also controlling more channels about Mixed Martial Arts, gaming, movies and more. If you don't personally know the company, that's why we have sites like Wikipedia. Strongly disagreeing with the nominator. Keep. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SauROnmiKE (talk • contribs) 13:27, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Neither of which are the subject of this article, so "something else is notable" is not a good argument.14:00, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Actually whoever watches the channel (max. 850.000 people), know about this thing, so it's very notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SauROnmiKE (talk • contribs) 21:12, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * So you should have no problems finding reliable independent sources providing significant coverage of this piece of cardboard right? Because that is what the article is missing right now.  MPJ  -DK 01:52, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - this is in WP:CSD territory. shoy (reactions) 14:43, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:45, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:45, 20 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Transclude WhatCulture Wrestling is more notable than the fictional title, even the WhatCulture itself. So, the content of the championship title should be transcluded to a new article about WhatCulture or its Wrestling subsidiary (I know their Pro Wrestling company and Pro Wrestling news agency are seperate). OnurT 01:32, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete If the organisation is not deemed notable for a Wikipedia page, then neither should one of its pro-wrestling titles and even if there was, WP:NOTINHERITED.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 21:55, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete This almost falls under "Hoax" territory. Not notable, not mentioned anywhere, not close to being a keep. CrispyGlover (talk) 19:39, 30 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.