Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What Girls Learn (lifetime movie)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure), it seems the consensus has reached a good keep. Deleting because it needs improving is not appropriate. Fr33kman talk APW 05:52, 13 September 2008 (UTC) deleted by  as the article has absolutely no assertion of notability whatsoever and no reliable sources to provide it with said assertions. Without prejudice to recreation which meets the notability and referencing standards from the getgo. Daniel (talk) 06:59, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

What Girls Learn (lifetime movie)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

TV adaptation of a novel. A few ghits, and some award nominations according to the IMDB page. Otherwise, doesn't appear to meet WP:MOVIE. Mr. Vernon (talk) 06:02, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. A movie made for a national network that is nominated for an Emmy? I don't see how this can't be considered notable. However the article need to be renamed to address the capitalization issue in the disambiguation. 23skidoo (talk) 17:24, 27 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Cirt (talk) 04:27, 2 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, nothing worth keeping here. No objection to a proper article being created though. Stifle (talk) 10:06, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: Nominated for awards which includes an Emmy. Schuym1 (talk) 21:41, 3 September 2008 (UTC) Only nominated for awards so Delete. Schuym1 (talk) 23:11, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - no sources given, and no claim to notability --T-rex 22:32, 3 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep nominated for an Emmy = notable.  Corvus cornix  talk  23:36, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Question where in the apparent plot summary does this article mention an Emmy? As it stands I'd say speedy delete for lack of context. Not saying an article can't exist but, this one paragraph isn't remotely it. Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:25, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * See .  Corvus cornix  talk  22:52, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * So not in the article itself. And since IMDB isn't reliable (it doesn't for instance say this particular movie was nominated but, that the writer was (but, doesn't say whether for this or something else she wrote). If the claim is included in the article and referenced to a reliable source for verification than so be it but, it wasn't when I asked the question. Jasynnash2 (talk) 07:56, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ff m  21:54, 8 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  17:23, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.