Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What Is Reformed Theology?


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep, those supporting merging are free to pursue that in the usual way. --Sam Blanning(talk) 18:44, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

What Is Reformed Theology?

 * — (View AfD)

Article does not assert its own notability, and this book is not more popular or deserving of a page than most of Sproul's other books (a number of which I have read). The book does not break any new ground and has not made any measurable impact like, say, MacArthur's Gospel According to Jesus. Article looks more like promotional piece than an encyclopedic description. --Fl e x (talk|contribs) 03:58, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - passes the proposed WP:BK. MER-C 04:36, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge back into Sproul's article. I think the actual content will fit in one sentence. --Brianyoumans 08:34, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge as by Brianyoumans, we don't nedd articles four sentences long. Alf photoman 12:39, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge as per Brianyoumans. -- Bpmullins | Talk 19:12, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge because this much content can reasonably be an annotation to the entry in the bibliography in the Sproul article. If someone wants to add extensive information about this book, then a separate article would be OK (with just a summary in the Sproul article). JamesMLane t c 05:25, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per nom. -- Wizardman 17:58, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.