Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What You've Done to Me


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Courcelles 01:40, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

What You've Done to Me

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NSONG. Not enough independent coverage for a stand alone article. Additionally, can content can easily be folded into the (currently short) article about the album Samantha Jade (album) LK (talk) 06:37, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - it's tight, but it may have enough coverage to pass NSONGS. Lukeno94 (talk) 12:57, 28 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: Seems to have enough coverage for a song. 108.21.12.231 (talk) 20:08, 28 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep – Duh! song has charted. It's notable. — Oz  22:59, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Charting in and of itself does not make a song notable, but this one went to number one and there's enough here for a start. -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 01:15, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep, obviously. The song was #1 in Australia and has enough coverage to warrant a standalone article. This was a poorly thought-out nomination, given the substantial amounts of views the article receives daily. If the nominator felt so strongly about the notability of the article, a merge would have been the best option. Readers would be directed to nowhere if this article was deleted. (I'M A ROCKET TO THE SUN, I'M A HEARTBEAT ON THE RUN / THAT'S WHAT YOU'VE DONE TO ME!!) Till  01:05, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Considering the debate about chart position has been going on at WP:NSONG, it seems consensus is set that top charting is notable as long as its supported by other material and sources. This article appears to meet both. Mkdw talk 07:59, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.