Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What is Mythology?


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete, and block article creator indefinitely for being a vandal who bragged about vandalism and boasted that he could not be stopped. DS 19:07, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

What is Mythology?
POV 1st person viewpoint fork of Mythology &rArr;    SWAT Jester    Ready    Aim    Fire!  16:11, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Tony Fox 16:15, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Do Not Delete This article does not violate any rules. What makes it a 1st person view? And what in blazes is a mythology fork?. What kind of person hunts for articles that they don't like and asks for them to be deleted? It doesn't break any rules, why delete it? And can you AT LEAST allow me to get it posted correctly before you request that it be deleted? It wont go away just because YOU want it to. JonnyLaw2121 16:18, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Violates WP:V, WP:OR, WP:NPOV, WP:POVFORK, for a start. Anything that goes in a "What is Mythology?" article should go in our article on Mythology instead. I'd say merge anything that can be salvaged (i.e. NPOV and not OR), but I don't think there's anything in there that fits that description. Delete. TheProject 16:24, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for violating WP:POV. Vizjim 16:23, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete POV. --Ton e  16:26, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

This is not an opinion. This is a discussion on Mythology. I'm not saying "This is what I think about mythology." This is the same as saying that not every person has the same fingerprints. No two people can see a story in the same light. It isn't an opinion, it is truth. You may not ike to be wrong, but this article is NOT an op[inion, and it will NOT go away! If you can cite one statement that is an opinion, do so. Otherwise, find some else to bother. JonnyLaw2121 17:05, 18 May 2006 Sandstein 17:07, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per TheProject. Yes, it will go away, just watch...

No, you "just watch". It may disappear, but that will be temporary. Plus, my article isn't the only one dissapearing... — Preceding unsigned comment added by JonnyLAw2121 (talk • contribs)

Delete as POV. -- stubblyh ea d | T/c 17:22, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

JonnyLAw2121 is a mock account. I just created it so I could post this article. I am not concerned if it is deleted, or if this IP address is banned. I'm am not on my main account, nor am I on my personal computer. Have fun trying to stop me now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WhOaMi (talk • contribs)
 * Oh noes, we will not stop him. Someone please think of the children.  :'-(  -- stubblyh ea d | T/c 17:31, 18 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - article is an unsourced, not very coherent, point of view. AnonEMouse (squeak) 18:11, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Personal essay using a rhetorical device, unencyclopædic. Mythology will give an answer to an interested researcher.  (aeropagitica)    (talk)   18:45, 18 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.