Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What is wrong with this picture?


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  06:05, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

What is wrong with this picture?

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable. Though everybody knows about screamers and all that stuff, we've seen no reliable sources of Internet Prank. Otherwise just games and screamers post all over the Internet. Also, the first part of the article before the "Internet Prank" should be merged with Highlights for Children. New Living Wiki Editor (talk) 11:45, 19 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete pure OR, unsourced article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:30, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 19 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Smerge and redirect as suggested. Bearian (talk) 20:44, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, possibly, but it is unsourced, and I see the target is flying virtually source-free as well. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:22, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, are you nominating the most popular kid's magazine for deletion? Bearian (talk) 17:46, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't dream of it, but it might be an idea if you felt it worth it to add a few sources over there. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:50, 28 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   17:49, 27 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment Added one ref which sources it as a well known Youtube or video prank. Edison (talk) 18:43, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 28 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete unreferenced essay on an unremarkable topic RadioFan (talk) 11:52, 28 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as unnotable, and original research. The only reference that the article provides isn't even talking about the subject at hand, and is about the most trivial mention of the concept possible. Rorshacma (talk) 16:22, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.