Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What to buy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete; looks like a test page to me, and also invoking WP:SNOW. Mojo Hand (talk) 03:23, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

What to buy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Self-proclaimed original research. Appears to be a guide suggesting what games to buy, but comes from the author's personal opinions and is not cited. Blatantly violates WP:NPOV and WP:NOR. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:19, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete now per nom. This isn't an article in any real sense. --Larry/Traveling_Man (talk) 02:12, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTBLOG because it looks like blog post material to me.  野狼院 ひさし  Hisashi Yarouin 02:15, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Obvious delete as just somebody's opinion. Surely this must fall under one of the speedy criteria?! Keresaspa (talk) 02:20, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:51, 9 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Obvious Delete Opinion rant.--DThomsen8 (talk) 02:56, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Why is this an AfD? No speedy delete available?--DThomsen8 (talk) 02:56, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't think that any of the criteria really fit here, although there ideally would be one that does. ansh666 03:02, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete and early close per WP:SNOW, for obvious enough reasons. ansh666 03:02, 9 October 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.