Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wheatfield Road


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 22:25, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Wheatfield Road

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Seems to lack enough notability to justify its own article. Wild Wolf (talk) 23:28, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 10 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Did you not look at the list of citations? It includes plenty of reliable sources that touch on this road.  Any significant component of this most important of American Civil War battlefields will have gotten tons of coverage from military historians.  Nyttend (talk) 00:05, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Pointless to have an article about a little point on the battlefield. 76.7.231.130 (talk) 01:02, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Road is not a "little point", point, or any other single location -- it is an area which has several notable sub-areas (battle et al) that themselves are not points, either. Target for Today (talk) 15:08, 22 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge – into Gettysburg battlefield or similar.  Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh &#91;chat] 23:20, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 02:11, 17 January 2012 (UTC)




 * Keep per Nyttend. There are plenty of references to establish notability. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 21:50, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Obvious Keep Meets all notability and inclusion criteria. Target for Today (talk) 15:08, 22 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.