Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wheaton, California


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:36, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Wheaton, California

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

In order to move things along, I'm nominating a group of rail locations in Lassen County, California whose only documentation in the articles is being listed in Durham's California place names book. I have been able to verify that most of them were rail locations from the list in this archive directory (expand the section "Southern Pacific Railroad Company" on the right, and pull the area wider to be able to read it), but that is pretty much all I can find out. They all point to either blanks spots or points at the edge of other towns. There's no evidence that any of these are actual settlements that I have found, though of course is someone finds some info to the contrary on one I will pull it from this nomination. Mangoe (talk) 04:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

In addition to Wheaton, I am nominating the following:

Mangoe (talk) 04:32, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 04:28, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 04:28, 19 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete All No evidence of significant coverage or official recognition of these railroad-related points; simply being listed in a gazetteer is not sufficient to establish notability or, arguably, verifiability. In general it makes the most sense to just delete these stubs with no prejudice against re-creation if notability can be demonstrated. –dlthewave ☎ 02:35, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete all Mass-produced without concern for WP:V or WP:N, with blatantly false content sullying the project for the last decade. Newspapers.com yields no results for any of these. Recreation welcome if accurate content of substance found. Reywas92Talk 05:42, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete All None of them are notable. Mass-produced, non-notable, inaccurate. Glendoremus (talk) 23:14, 22 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.