Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wheel of Fortune in popular culture (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete ck lostsword•T•C 12:28, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Wheel of Fortune in popular culture
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Jeopardy! in popular culture was just listed for deletion, I feel that the same situation could be applied here, do we really need another _____ in popular culture article? If there's anything of major significance here, maybe merge it into Wheel of Fortune? Rackabello 06:12, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Pat: Alright Rackabello, pick five consonants and a vowel... Me: I'll take a D an E an L another E a T and another E Rackabello 06:14, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - it's just a massive list of poorly sourced trivia. --Haemo 08:16, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a bunch of trivial mentions.  Every time person X from one show mentions person Y from another show, a line would be added to wikipedia.   This is the same as Presidents in popular culture where we could docuement every time that a tv show refers to the presidency.  Corpx 08:28, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge notable bits to main TV show article - Ed Grimley says "that's completely mental, I must say!" Guroadrunner 08:58, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Overlistification proposal. Not every TV show can have a list like this. Bulldog123 15:47, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as a directory of loosely associated topics. That a TV show parodied WoF or someone said "I'd like to buy a vowel" on another show tells us nothing about the show containing the quote, WoF or the world in general. Otto4711 17:19, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete that's horrible! OysterGuitarst 22:15, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Partial Merge some of the content as mentionned by Guroadrunner. All the less useful stuff can be thrown out.--JForget 02:06, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * DLT, and I'd like to be an "E", Pat. per nom and ample precedent. Carlossuarez46 23:18, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions.  -- John Vandenberg 09:47, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Otto. Yet another violation of WP:NOT. Not to mention it completely lacks sources. María ( críticame ) 12:28, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.