Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/When Worlds Collide (2010 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 08:54, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

When Worlds Collide (2010 film)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Future film not even close to passing WP:NFF. Any reliably sourced information about the supposed remake can be included as a section in When Worlds Collide (film). Hqb (talk) 17:03, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: at, it stated:
 * In the July 2009 issue of Fantastique magazine, director Sommers had the following to say in an interview: "Steven Spielberg and I have a great script for When Worlds Collide. We just have to wait now because of Roland Emmerich’s 2012. It’s too close a project."
 * Doesn't this imply pre-production?--Coin945 (talk) 17:23, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles.". Joe Chill (talk) 17:27, 10 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: Per Coin. Joe Chill (talk) 17:27, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- Joe Chill (talk) 17:28, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice until principal photography has begun, as noted above. Cliff smith  talk  19:58, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. A film with a script alone is not a notable film! Fences  &amp;  Windows  02:35, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete There are plenty of great scripts languishing in archive boxes. Wait until this one starts filming.  Background info can go in the original When Worlds Collide (film) --Elen of the Roads (talk) 22:00, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Bearian (talk) 18:55, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Incubate so that article concerns may be better addressed. Coverage of this project since 2004 in Rs and in books allows that it may prove to be one of those rare exceptions to WP:NFF. My opinion is that there is nothing wrong with the article that cannot be fixed... including concerns with copyvio. I had many years ago read both When Worlds Collide and the sequel After Worlds Collide, and although I was disappointed in how the 1951 film failed to meet expectations, if this gets to the incubator, I will happily assist in addresing concerns and improving sourcing. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 22:20, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.