Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whenever


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Punkmorten 10:37, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Whenever
This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages" overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 16:40, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per my rationale at Articles for deletion/Esoteric programming languages. —Ruud 12:51, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, W.marsh 02:17, 6 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Joke language, more or less; no complete interpreters appear to exist (the one on the author's page is incomplete!) and no references turned up on a search besides the author's site and Wikipedia. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 09:42, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Zetawoof. Dekimasu 11:39, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per User:Zetawoof. If it's never been implemented, it's certainly non-notable. J I P  | Talk 12:05, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Zetawoof --Maelnuneb (Talk) 15:28, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It seems that this is a language definition that is intended to be funny. People with a short attention span, like the readers of an encyclopedia,, are unlikely to make sense of it in the time available.  If it's not notable, and it's not interesting, then I think we should vote to delete. EdJohnston 22:31, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.