Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where's my meniscus?

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 00:48, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)

Where's my meniscus?
This search term only gets 251 hits in google, most of which are Wikipedia clones or h2g2 clones. The alexa rank of the given link is over 4 million. Non-Notable, and er... original research? --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 17:24, Jan 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * When it is played by a lot more than a scant few people (I count ten members from the "about us" page.) who used to belong to a society at the University of Oxford, then it will perhaps be notable. Delete. Uncle G 17:48, 2005 Jan 28 (UTC)
 * Delete. I know I shouldn't bite the newbies, but apart from being very obscure and not in any way widely practised, isn't that rather too nerdy to have any chance of spreading? (I have a degree in Astrophysics, so I know nerdy). Average Earthman 18:20, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't think you have to worry about biting any newbies. If you look at the history, this article has been around since December 13, 2003.  If anything, this is the counter-argument to Jimbo's "5-minute" spam removal hypothesis.  --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 19:26, Jan 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * Alexa ranking nearly 5 million in fact; that's worse than mine. Fails the "more notable than me" test. Delete. Raven42 21:14, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, agree with DropDeadGorgias. JoaoRicardo 22:40, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable enough localised drinking game. Megan1967 00:56, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.