Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where Are You (Bee Gees song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Discussion regarding a name change for the article can continue on its talk page. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 21:11, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Where Are You (Bee Gees song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Song not released as single. Non-charting. Non-notable. Lyrical and production info are pure WP:OR. Fails WP:NMUSIC ES  &#38;L  13:26, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. This is getting tedious.TheLongTone (talk) 15:17, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 04:11, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 04:11, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 04:11, 28 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. "Where Are You" has been covered by Mike Furber, and his version was released as a single, and his version was charted in Australia, as I added his version on the article and added a few sources. -- PogiJmon (talk) 2:03, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The only possible way that this info is beneficial is for article to be renamed, and to focus around that release of of the song as opposed to the non-notable release - plus remove the WP:OR from the whole thing ES  &#38;L  18:13, 31 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 21:40, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 January 5.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 02:24, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero  &#124;  My Talk  06:47, 14 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep as the Mike Furber version charted. A change of name is appropriate, though.Doctorhawkes (talk) 02:45, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.