Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where the Blind Horse Sings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  23:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Where the Blind Horse Sings

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The article contains two lengthy quotes of copyrighted material. WP:COPYQUOTE advises that "extensive quotation of copyrighted text is prohibited" and "The copied material should not be a substantial portion of the work being quoted". The article does not comply with these guidelines. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 23:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 23:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Meets WP:NBOOK. I've done a bit of cleanup on the page, and removed the lengthy quotes. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 23:52, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep, especially with ARandomName123's cleanup. The current state of the article doesn't matter; problems can be solved through editing. The thing that makes a difference per WP:NBOOK is that the book has received at least two reviews, which it has. Toughpigs (talk) 00:02, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * After cleanup I withdraw my nomination Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 16:12, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:NBOOK.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.