Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whispering Cedars Baptist Camp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Closing per WP:GNG. SarahStierch (talk) 07:36, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Whispering Cedars Baptist Camp

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable camp; Google searches yield no results other than pages affiliated with the camp or what appear to be advertisements for the camp, page seems to basically be an advertisement for the camp. MsFionnuala (talk) 00:17, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can find no reliable sources indicating notability and I agree, it reads like an advertisement.  Ubelowme U  Me  01:25, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 9 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Aside from no RS, makes no claim of notability. If it was notable at all, I would expect verifiable blurbs in local press at least. Celtechm (talk) 02:26, 9 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete no claim of notability, promotional article created by a COI account RadioFan (talk) 22:33, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Although this org has some longevity (factor under WP:NONPROFIT), it doesn't have national/international scope or apparently any unique drivers of media / scholarly attention. 200 campers / year is not a large size either. --Lquilter (talk) 23:18, 9 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Wikipedia should not be promoting another fascist Christian organization. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.134.180.64 (talk) 23:19, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * WP:POV - that statement could be taken as defamatory, please strike it. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:44, 9 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - I think that there shouldn't be just one person editing this page, If you see something wrong with it, fix it. As for too much advertising, I agree there are some possible promotional phrases, but what's stopping you from fixing them? Wikipedia is a team effort. --WCBCConnected (talk) 00:46, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - We can't "fix" non-notable. We cannot conjure up reliable 3rd-party sources that do not exist. MsFionnuala (talk) 01:21, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'm not asking you do that, I'm asking that if you see something that you CAN fix, like promotional phrasing, fix it! --WCBCConnected (talk) 19:17, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - This purpose of this discussion isn't to determine if there are things to fix.  It's to determine if this subject meets wikipedia notability guidelines.  If you feel that it can meet them, please share your thoughts here and be as specific as possible.--RadioFan (talk) 20:31, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm not finding anything online that shows this meets WP:GNG. First Light (talk) 20:41, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unable to locate sources that indicate this meets WP:GNG. jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 23:31, 10 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources.  The article is entirely promotional in nature (aguably a candaidate for speedy deletion). -- Whpq (talk) 15:29, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.