Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitby Seafoods Ltd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:30, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Whitby Seafoods Ltd

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article looks as though it has been completely abandoned unfinished by the company that created it. In view of what Brad Patrick has said, I suggest  it just gets deleted. Aspro (talk) 17:34, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Google turns up a good deal of food trade media coverage . A rewrite for the article is in order. Warrah (talk) 17:52, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment:Being able to afford to fill up cyberspace with a lot of paid for Advertorials is not the same thing as legitimate trade news coverage. WP is not a trade directory although many people are trying to make it so. If they were happy enough to start it why should we have to finnish it off for them? It teaching them the wrong thing--Aspro (talk) 19:29, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete It was CoI at the time and I can't see anything that indicates particular notability. Thedarxide (talk) 17:46, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: There is no evidence that the references are advertorials, and CoI is not a reason for deletion. The article is adequately referenced. -- Eastmain (talk) 19:20, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I think it's blatant advertorial. The Retail section is particularly out of place. Langcliffe (talk) 20:11, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  — Eastmain (talk) 19:26, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  — Eastmain (talk) 19:26, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  — Eastmain (talk) 19:26, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per tonnage of frozen battered and breadcrumbed seafood sold. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:31, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep looks to be notable enough by references though badly written and in need of work but that is no reason for deletion. Keith D (talk) 00:57, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.