Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Coat Admissions Strategists


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:30, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

White Coat Admissions Strategists

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Minimal coverage. Not notable. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:58, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep International coverage in the first two months of operation satisfies me. Rhadow (talk) 10:05, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Withdraw my Keep I rewrote the article.  Yeh I know now, one article outside the campus isn't enough.  It's an interesting concept though, instead of having former admissions officers give advice, they will employ med students who just got into school -- as if they don't have enough studying to do. And there are some other interesting tidbits I found for my (short-lived) revision.  Bye Rhadow (talk) 20:37, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: lack of WP:SIGCOV leads to failure of WP:NORG.   Dr Strauss   talk   19:22, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L3X1 (distænt write)   )evidence(  01:50, 6 August 2017 (UTC)


 * No more COI One thing is for sure, no word from the original article remains, except the name of the outfit and its founders.. Rhadow (talk) 01:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- lacks notability, per available sources. Few consulting services are notable, and 3-person ones do not meet the mark, for sure. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:07, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete – Three-person startups are rarely notable by WP standards. The press coverage offered doesn't show why this is extraordinary. ☆ Bri (talk) 06:56, 6 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.