Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White House Grammar School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Early close as keep, per WP:SNOW ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 11:45, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

White House Grammar School

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

This page is written like an advertisement, and is not very notable. Lucasoutloud (talk) 04:02, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs)  04:13, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs)  04:13, 27 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs)  04:13, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs)  04:13, 27 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. All high schools are notable. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 04:13, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I disagree. A tiny school in Pakistan isn't very notable at all. Lucasoutloud (talk) 05:06, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * It is a huge school serving many students and population.hussaintaha
 * Keep Relatively well written article on a high school. Its existence has been verified.  Difficulty in finding sources is due to systemic bias.  Ryan Vesey  Review me!  05:47, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per the usual result for high schools. — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 09:51, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep – Per Notability (high schools). Northamerica1000(talk) 20:52, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - We keep high schools for the very good reason that experience shows that, with enough research, sources can invariably be found that meet WP:ORG. Google is a very poor tool for finding sources on Pakistani schools because, unlike US schools, they don't dump everything on the Internet. Indeed, very few have much of an Internet presence at all. We must avoid systemic bias and allow time for local sources to be researched since no evidence has been adduced that this school cannot meet notability requirements. TerriersFan (talk) 00:16, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Consensus is that all verified secondary schools are notable. The fact it's in Pakistan is utterly irrelevant and I'm mystified as to why the nominator thinks it is relevant. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:06, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm disappointed by the quality of comments above, many are using the old "inherited notability" fallacy. The criteria for inclusion for high schools, per WP:ORG and WP:NHS is notability, not existance.  Them From  Space  19:21, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * No, the criterion is consensus and one has already been clearly established for secondary schools. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:45, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Per the policy on notability of high schools and the comments by other users above participating in this AfD.  Mar4d  ( talk ) 13:11, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - user from Wikiproject Pakistan - per WP:NHS. -- lTopGunl (talk) 13:22, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.