Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Label Communications Ltd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:52, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

White Label Communications Ltd

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreferenced & WP:COI article. Presumed non-notable. Someone not using his real name (talk) 05:34, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Someone not using his real name (talk) 05:34, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Someone not using his real name (talk) 05:35, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Someone not using his real name (talk) 05:35, 4 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete fails GNG BlueSalix (talk) 07:50, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence found that this firm is/was notable. (More coverage was found of a US marketing firm of this name.) AllyD (talk) 07:55, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah, Hoovers' has a bit of data on a company with this name, but that is a Pittsburgh-based company (and with 5 employees and $340K in annual sales probably not notable either.)Someone not using his real name (talk) 16:15, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete unless someone can come up with some RS refs. VMS Mosaic (talk) 03:35, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.