Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Lotus Tea Club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:59, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

White Lotus Tea Club

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG and is largely promotional. A CSD was previously declined. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:56, 21 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Also fails notability requirements listed in WP:COMPANY.  The Blue Canoe  12:04, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not satisfy notability requirements of either WP:GNG or WP:NCORP — Alan / Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:40, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails all relevant guidelines. A primary source and a hometown newspaper do not make for evidence of notability. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 12:49, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even though the article is only mildly promotional, it still fails inclusion with notability. Fylbecatulous talk 12:52, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Although it's mildly promotional that could be fixed, Anyway as there's not much evidence of notability - The best solution is delete for now. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  15:01, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 21 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nom and the above comments. --Jersey92 (talk) 21:55, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete I am sure that it is a wonderful little business, but it is of local interest only. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  05:08, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.