Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Ops


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dan Kaminsky. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:57, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

White Ops

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND, WP:SIRS   scope_creep Talk  12:04, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Dan Kaminsky: Querying with, the sources found on Google News all fails the ORGIND or CORPDEPTH since the sources are press releases or cover routine events.  The sources in the article are slightly better, but cannot constitute as coverage for the company according to PROJECT:NCORP.Redirect per ATD-R. ~  Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 12:40, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:07, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Dan Kaminsky as above. Topic fails WP:NCORP but redirect as per WP:ATD  HighKing++ 19:58, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep meets WP:GNG. There are some significant coverage, some passing mentions, some more than passing mentions, but many notable publications, including WSJ, FastCompany, AdWeek,Adweek (the last 2 are Ad industry leading publications). Webmaster862 (talk) 02:32, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:24, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The Fast Company reference fails WP:ORGIND, the AdWeek is a press-release also failing WP:CORPDEPTH and the WSJ article is routine news about investments, in several countries, constituting a passing mention. The Adage article is a routine annoucement of investment and partnership, which fails WP:CORPDEPTH   scope_creep Talk  08:55, 16 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.