Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Rabbit Radio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Consensus seems to be divided between "keep" and "delete". (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃  (ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 00:00, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

White Rabbit Radio

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article makes no specific claim of importance and overall fails WP:GNG. There are not multiple, independent sources covering the subject in-depth. User:Namiba 15:51, 27 October 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 16:20, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Internet. User:Namiba 15:51, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:18, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep The article currently cites 4 sources:
 * 2 from the Southern Poverty Law Center, which are in depth and independent from the topic (but are substantially similar to one another such that I only count them as one source)
 * One from Houma Today, about a sheriff's deputy who was relieved of duty due to her on-line activities. This article, although it's about the deputy, does provide substantial coverage of WRR in the context of her activities involving it.
 * One from the New York Times about far right groups finding legitimacy due to Trump's rhetoric. WRR is mentioned in that article as discussing that the president's statements had made their own views "mainstream".  This source does not amount to the in-depth coverage required for GNG.
 * I'm able to find additional coverage in Homeland Security Today(discussing the use of cryptocurrency to fund the activities of hate groups, including the one in question), Media Matters (discussing their activities on Trovo), and The Guardian (discussing the reach WRR has among white supremacists and its influence in getting listeners to sign a petition).
 * I'll see if I can make time over the next week to expand the article a bit with the additional sources I've found (but not linked). However, I would say the Southern Policy Law Center source and the Houma Today source combine to meet (certianly) the burden of A7 and also to meet the lower end of the burden of GNG. ~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 18:07, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Important for research on white racism. Reevev (talk) 19:52, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:02, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Most results for "White Rabbit Radio" have to do with Spotify playlists, the former CKCU-FM radio show, and artists with White Rabbit in their names, all of which don't share this thing's views. Just another 'guy with microphone' podcast/YouTube thing that most people have ignored outside sources which have make it hard to find the thing.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 23:15, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:GNG per ONUnicorn's argument. SBKSPP (talk) 23:45, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete The page doesn’t tell you a single thing. It looks like it was written by the subject itself. He’s written himself into imdb, too. While the sources paint a picture that could warrant an article, somebody needs to submit at least a stub, a thesis. I’ve had much more substantial articles rejected. Sveinbjornpalsson (talk) 05:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete The sources are only mentions of it. Nothing substantive and very far from GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 21:11, 10 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.