Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Star (cider)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 04:38, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

White Star (cider)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete no indication that the cider in this one-line article is notable. Carlossuarez46 21:15, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep I know the brewery who makes this cider, and I think it's been making it for over 200 years. I think the article should be heavily expanded.... scope_creep 21:35, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Please see WP:IKNOWIT. --Dhartung | Talk 22:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Not much to see there, I'm afraid. JuJube 06:23, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment er ... apparently you can only get there via WP:IDONTKNOWIT but it covers both concepts. --Dhartung | Talk 08:01, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I created WP:IKNOWIT just right here and now as a redirect.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 14:47, 2 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. I can't find much beyond teh ratebeer page, with one vote. Not even the apparent brand owner actually has a page on it. I wasn't able to turn up anything substantial in Google News Archive, either. Even if it's venerable, there's no evidence it's Wikipedia-notable. --Dhartung | Talk 22:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. I actually bought a bottle of this once (it is sold in co-op stores in the UK), and it tasted disgusting, as the ratebeer reviewer seems to agree - it's a very cheap brand of white cider and is probably drunk mainly by alcoholics, students and people living on benefits. I say weak delete unless sources are provided. At the moment, it's a substub and could be deleted for lacking context, speedily.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 14:06, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete per nom, would keep if article were expanded and better-sourced AndalusianNaugahyde 20:56, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. Axl 10:17, 3 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.